UnSpirituality Podcast (Nov. 15, 2020): 'The Billy Meier & Michael Horn UFO Hoax Exposed'

Read: unSpirituality
Watch: youtube

BMUFOR (Feb. 4, 2020): Did Billy Meier predict the Wuhan-Coronavirus outbreak in 1995?

Coronaviruses are a group of viruses that have a halo, or crown-like (corona) appearance when viewed under an electron microscope.

In the article – Corona Virus Epidemic Predicted in 1995…by Billy Meier – published by Michael Horn on Jan, 25, 2020, he claims that Billy Meier had predicted the current 2019–20 Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak way back in 1995, 25 years before the event occurred.

Michael cites the following verse from Contact Report (CR) 251, a record of the conversation that supposedly happened between Billy and the Plejaren extraterrestrial Ptaah on February 3, 1995:

A lung disease will also break out in humans through the guilt of China, where bioweapons are being researched and a carelessness is releasing pathogens.

 Did Billy Meier predict the Wuhan-Coronavirus outbreak in 1995?

Find the TRUTH here: BMUFOR

p.s.: Whatever the truth may be, we wish Billy Meier a happy birthday who just turned 83 yesterday i.e. on Feb. 3, 2020!! 

Michael Horn and Billy Meier: Fake UFO's and Aliens (Sep. 6, 2018)

Watch: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3 & Part 4 and also Michael Horn's INSANE Billy Meier Claims
Read our previous article from Unspiritualty: ufoprophet

Investigative Journalist Leslie Kean on the Billy Meier UFO case (December 2006)

Leslie Kean

What follows below is an email correspondence between James Deardorff and Leslie Kean, in which Ms. Kean has expressed her views on the Meier case in general.

                                 James Deardorff to Leslie Kean: December 4, 2006

Dear Leslie,

Larry Driscoll sent me a copy of your latest email (UFOProphet note: Leslie Kean's responses to Larry Driscoll are in blue) with him, I hope that's OK. He sent it to me because he knows I've been investigating the Meier case since 1980 and have come to the same conclusions that all the other primary investigators have (Wendelle Stevens, Lee & Brit Elders, Gary Kinder, Michael Hesemann, Michael Horn): no way could it possibly be a hoax. I've long since exposed Kal Korff's stuff (and book) to be totally false or misleading and replete with distortions and omissions of much relevant evidence.

I'm a PhD with plenty of honors in my professional field of science before retiring, and so feel that my voice ought to be given at least as much attention as that of Richard Hall, Budd Hopkins, Stanton Friedman,or Mark Rodigher, who haven't looked seriously into the primary investigators' findings or researched the case for themselves.

I know I can't change your opinions on the case any more than we can change the opinions of congressmen who have long been brainwashed into thinking that UFOs can't be real. But I can't just let your statements to Larry go unchallenged and uncorrected. So let me try to set the record straight below:

Larry,

Thanks for taking the time to send me the materials. I admire your energy and diligent work, and I think your energy, applied to actual scientifically-based UFO research, would be helpful to all those doing UFO work. They need more people willing to work as hard as you seem to have been doing.

However, the Meier case has long been regarded by the majority of researchers who know anything about it as a fraud. I am aware that out of the serious UFO researchers there still remain a few who take Meier seriously, but long ago, the evidence for his deliberate hoaxing led virtually the entire UFO research community to reject him and his faked evidence.

"Deliberate hoaxing" is just horribly incorrect (please excuse my lack of tact or diplomacy, it can't be helped here). As a contactee Meier stands out so strongly in the amount and quality of positive evidence he was allowed to accumulate that the "mainstream" UFO investigators could not tolerate it. And so they ignored all the supportive evidence and listened just to those who don't think that aliens/ETs could be smarter than we are and have a strategy of dealing with us.

His recent split with his wife, and her testimony as to how she helped him create his frauds, were the final nails in the coffin.

That happened only after she decided she wanted out -- wanted a divorce so that she wouldn't be left alone so often at night with Billy Meier out enjoying conversations with Semjase. She had come under the influence of Swiss ufologist Luc Buergin who is of a mind like Korff. Meier freely stated from the first that he had had a model UFO made so that he could photograph it and see if his photos of it would look like the real thing; they didn't, so he tossed them. Why should he be faulted for that?

You may not be aware that years earlier, in 1979, she was interviewed on video tape, and then her children also, as to the "beamship" sightings she had had in connection with Meier's contacts, and with Meier's sudden disaapearance at the start of one contact. It's on tape, Leslie, I have the tape. One of the adult witnesses with her gave his written report of it also (in Stevens' 1982 book and in my website. The sound quality of the tape was poor, and so Lee & Brit Elders didn't utilize it in their extensive series of videos on the case. If you were to get interested, you could look here for a summary: www.tjresearch.info/witnessa.htm.

Or read the testimony of the earliest known witness, Phobal Cheng, at:
www.tjresearch.info/Phobal_plain_text.htm

Or look over the list of credible witnesses to his contact-related events, who have given their names:
www.tjresearch.info/witness-list.htm

Have you ever read Kal Korf’s book exposing his various hoaxes and fraudulent photos?

His book on the case has been thoroughly refuted, just as has his book on Roswell. Again, if you were to have the time, you could learn of this at:
www.tjresearch.info/moretree.htm
www.tjresearch.info/bachtel.htm
www.tjresearch.info/hasenbol.htm
www.tjresearch.info/Wedcake.htm
www.tjresearch.info/Ober-Sad.htm

In his book, Korff also paints a totally false picture about the Talmud of Jmmanuel document. Distortion after distortion, lie after lie:
www.tjresearch.info/refutekk.htm

I have not put a lot of time in studying this myself, because I rely on a number of trusted advisors who have ben working for decades on doing the best UFO research around. I trust their research and their conclusions; I don't have time to look into every UFO case. Some excellent researchers are Richard Hall, Budd Hopkins, Stanton Friedman, and Mark Rodigher from CUFOS. Bruce Maccabee does photo analysis.

I also give a lot of weight to Maccabee's analyses. He once wrote an article about the incident on 8mm movie tape in which Semjase maneuvered the ship back and forth over a treetop, and calculated the length of a string that would account for it if it were a model suspended from a pole (12 to 14 ft or so). In his website article on it, his conclusion was that the viewer should draw their own conclusion. But in it, he made a valuable additional calculation -- if it were a model swinging from a pole above a baby tree or model tree, the tree would have been only 2 1/2 to 3 ft tall, and would have been some 50 ft away from the camera! Try handling a pole over 50 ft long with suspended model some time, or even 25 ft! This is written up in:
www.tjresearch.info/BillyYes.htm (scroll down), with a link to Maccabee's website article.

One of the things I've learned from the high level Washington people I've worked with in CFi is that the language you use, and the choice of material sent, to anyone in power, such as the Congress, is absolutely crucial. As I said in Roll Call, we cannot tell these people that we have any answers, but can only say we have a mystery on out hands that needs to be looked into. Material like Billy Meier is the wrong kind of stuff to send these people for two reasons - one, that it doesn't leave the UFO question open but presents all kinds of claims of conversation with women ETs, "PleiadianPlejaren Extraterrestrials Contact" and trips throught time, etc (stuff that no skeptic could ever accept even if it were true), and two, that it is at best extremely controversal because many excellent investigators have shown it to be a fraud.

I certainly realize this, Leslie. But some of us do have to put truth ahead of political objectives. In so doing, we've sacrificed our "UFO" reputations but at least have clear consciences!

Thanks for reading this

                                 Leslie Kean to James Deardorff: December 8, 2006

Jim,

I've been away and I'm just catching up; I'm very rushed because I leave town again tomorrow for a week. I remember speaking to you when I did my piece on criop circles; I quoted you in the story that first appeared in the Providence Journal.

Thanks for all the info. I simply don't have time to follow up on all this. The bottom line is that I know that this case is not one that I can work with in my work in Washington with CFi. Too many people who I trust don't agree with your assessment of it. I can only work with cases that don't have this kind of controversy. I continue to trust my close advisors who have served me well for many years.

Approaching people in DC is not about "truth" or feeling good about your "clear conscience." It's about finding a strategy that works, so you can open the door a crack and get them to take the subject seriously. I don't know if you understand how difficult this is to accomplish. But a case like Meier will never work, and if you continue to send this stuff around, it will only have a negative affect, and they will take one look and not bother to read it.

Thanks a lot for your input, but that's how I have to leave it right now.

I wish you all the best.

UnSpirituality (Jan. 17, 2018): The Billy Meier Story Debunked

Watch: youtube/unSpirituality
Read the original article: unSpirituality.com (Feb. 27, 2017)

International UFO Reporter (May/June, 1989): 'Billy, no; Ed, yes' by Bruce Maccabee

Note: Points written down throughout the article at the edges with pencil, was the work of the late James W. Deardorff.

Read full article: drive/ufoprophet
Source: Archives Project

Frontiers of Science (Mar-Apr, 1981): 'The Billy Meier Hoax' by Kal K. Korff

 

 

Source: Archives Project
Also read: Frontiers of Science (vol II, no. 4, May-June 1980): 'Update on the Pleiades Contact Case'

A Different Perspective (Nov. 1, 2017): Host Kevin Randle with Derek Bartholomaus on Billy Meier Hoax

Derek Bartholomaus is the creator of the Billy Meier UFO Case website. 

Derek began investigating the claims of Billy Meier in 2003 when he was part of the Independent Investigations Group (IIG). Michael Horn had started challenging the IIG to “prove that Meier’s UFO photos were a hoax. The Billy Meier UFO Case website was constructed as a repository of various investigations into the claims of Billy Meier. Much of the research has been done by Derek personally. The rest has been published with permission of other people who have looked into the claims of Billy Meier. 

Derek works professionally in the entertainment industry as a Post Production Producer on various televisionshows. He is also the creator of the Anti-Vaccine Body Count (formerly known as the Jenny McCarthy Body Count) website. Derek has not had the time to update either website since fostering, and then adopting, children in 2015.

Listen: youtube

'Evidence of fraud discovered again: Billy Meier's spaceship photos' - JUFOF Nr. 122 (February 1999)

German UFO researcher, Hans-Werner Peiniger has published an article - Wieder Hinweise auf Schwindel entdeckt: Billy Meiers Raumschiff-Fotos / Evidence of fraud discovered again: Billy Meier's spaceship photos - in his Journal für UFO-Forschung (JUFOF), Nr. 122, February, 1999.

Billy Meier's "Wedding-cake" UFO or WCUFO

Comparison of Meier's WCUFO parts with flower pot-holder and bookshelf-pins

Comparison of Meier's WCUFO with the garbage can lid

 

Comparison of Meier's WCUFO with the garbage can lid

For complete article, read: JUFOF Nr. 122 (this text is extracted from a reprint, from JUFOF Nr. 185, pgs. 148-151, May 2009)
My sincere thanks to Hans-Werner Peiniger for sharing all his JUFOF articles on Meier case with me.

Further reading:
Die Reporter (Pro7 TV, May 27, 1999): German UFO researcher deconstructs Billy Meier's WCUFO and Asket-Nera photos

'Between the Lies: The Hoax and the Paranormal' - by Jeff Ritzmann (April 12, 2017)

 

Jeff Ritzmann

Photographed Model. Was it real or Meieresque?

But let's look at what effect hoaxes have on people in the field: the discovery of a hoax, and the aftermath of the presentation that the data is demonstrably fake.

The Billy Meier case is a wonderful example, rich with fakery and trickster thematics. Anyone who's known me over the years remembers my close to 2 year involvement in demonstrating what kind of hokum this case is. The operative question is - should I have gone on that long with it?
Of course not.

I found myself quickly at odds with Meier case believers - even long before my public examples of deception within the case. I gave a presentation in the late 90's to a conference in Washington D.C. and during the lecture mentioned that until we 'shelf things like the Billy Meier case, not much is going to be taken seriously by the public at large, much less anyone working in any branch of science'.

After the lecture, I had a contentious encounter in the hotel with a gentleman who held a PhD in physics.

"The only part of your presentation I take issue with is your statement about the Billy Meier case. I've done a lot of looking into that and I'd say you're completely wrong there." he said with a furrowed brow.

"Well I've spent a lot of time on it too. And if you think those photos and films represent anything other than models and simple forced perspective you're dead wrong." I replied.

One of our mutual friends said something like "Bob has a doctorate in physics he's a..." I interrupted to say it was nice to meet him (as I shook his hand), but it didn't change my statement of the case or the evidence. I also went a step further "The difference between your stance and mine on this case is I can conclusively demonstrate and prove mine." (Knowing full well that he couldn't.)

"Bob", tended to get a bit intense as he railed my 'ignorance' and 'fear of the truth' and added "I don't know much about the photos, but the written information of prophecy is solid!"

He didn't know much about the photos? Could this be serious? This is how Meier entered the field's eye - his clear, daylight photos of alleged UFOs. How could someone so obsessed with Meier's prophetic writings (which are also nonsense btw), be blissfully unaware of the volume of alleged UFO photos an film?

This is yet another example of the complete loss of critical thought by accomplished scientists upon entering into the field(s) of the paranormal variety. We've spoken about this effect before here.

In later years I would get into discussions with accomplished meteorological scientist Dr. James Deardorff (another supporter of the Meier case) that were equally as absurd. I would eventually join a Yahoo group devoted to the Meier case, where I would present all matter of photographic demonstrations showing the photos to be faked. I was challenged that if they were simply models on a string, that I should be able to duplicate that easily. So I did. (Left)

The photo was a small model suspended on a string from my deck. Many of the members found the image of the model in the file section of the group and posted asking "when/where did Billy take this photo?" I then reminded them that this was the duplication that was asked for and posted days before. Several (and some prominent) members of the group left, and wrote me privately to say they couldn't believe how fooled they had been.

There are still people from all walks of life and profession that solidly believe the Meier case is the best evidence of UFO contact ever. By many more, it is considered the longest enduring hoax in UFOlogy.

I use this case because it's such a great example of the repeated disconnect from critical thought exhibited when clearly faked (some laughably so) photos are presented as legitimate.

But was my obsession with showing obviously faked photos to be...obviously faked photos, logical? No it wasn't. Taunting, duplication challenges, and sometimes even physical threats from believers only have so much effect - after awhile it just doesn't phase you. The depth and length of my involvement was irrational considering the painfully obvious fabrication of the case and it's 'evidence'.

You become so involved that you completely lose sight of the fact: no one with any critical faculties believes the case anyway. You are killing a mouse with a howitzer. It's overkill in the extreme.

Later with the epiphanies I would learn from George Hansen, I would recognize these patterns of irrational obsession with disproving hoaxes and hoaxers, and accept that such things are to be expected in the paranormal field.

 
Read the full article: The Numinous Den
Jeff Ritzmann: Linkedin

BMUFOR: Billy Meier's Epic of Gilgamesha - Predicting the Future but Forgetting the Past

Another instance of Meier failing to keep up with his own tall tales

left: Gilgamesha is seen in red shirt, December 1974; right: Gilgamesha with her dog, circa 2015

Did Meier/Plejaren, in December 1979, predict the serious car accident his daughter Gilgamesha has met with almost 12 years later in August 1991?

To find the answer, visit BMUFOR.

THE JOHN & HEIDI SHOW (Nov. 9) and END OF DAYS (Nov. 12, 2016) - Interviews with Michael Horn

Listen: spreaker

Listen: youtube

Are Billy Meier’s Spiritual Teachings Homophobic? – Deception and coverup from mid-1990’s (Part 2/2)

In the first part of the article – Are Billy Meier’s Spiritual Teachings Homophobic? – Part 1/2: The original teachings from 1970’s, 80’s and early 90’s – we have concluded that the so-called “spiritual” teachings disseminated by Meier, either conveyed by him or through PETALE/High-Council/Plejaren ETs/Jmmanuel, unambiguously espouses a vicious, reprehensible and pseduoscientific homophobic doctrine. As a result of our exposé, FIGU instead of allowing its members to have a rational discussion on our findings in its forum, rather decided to ban Mahesh Karumudi from posting any texts or BMUFOR links on the FIGU forum.1 Towards the end of that Part 1/2 article, we have also indicated that Meier perhaps under the pressure or barrage of complaints received from his own group members, readers/followers and critics was compelled make a flip-flop on this issue from around mid-1990’s. And one set of complaints has clearly originated from the readers of the 2nd English edition of Talmud Jmmanuel (TJ) published in 1992, a year after the 2nd German edition came out.2 So, in this Part 2/2 article, we will be addressing the following questions: 

1. How did Meier flip-flop?
2. When did Meier flip-flop?
3. Do these new “explanations” and “clarifications” really hold up or not?

Read More: BMUFOR
Read: Part 1/2

Fade to Black (October 19, 2016): Host Jimmy Church on why Billy Meier UFO Case is a Hoax

Listen: youtube (from ~2 hr:32 min)
Source: FadetoBlack

Cause and Effect: Ex-FIGU members take revenge on UFO Billy Meier and Michael Horn

Note: Thanks for the Bellgab forum member for originally reporting this.

  
Ex-FIGU members, who apparently left Billy Meier's group (FIGU) have vowed to make available all of Meier/FIGU/Michael Horn's material online for free. Following is their statement published under the description part of each torrent file:

"Who are we? 

We are a group of ex-FIGU members who once naively believed Billy Meier/FIGU/Michael Horn's tall tales and got deceived by their lies and fraud. Finally we have opened our eyes and left Meier's cult group (FIGU) once and for all. We owe great appreciation to the people behind these following websites: 

billymeierufo.com 
billymeierufocase.com 
billymeieruforesearch.com 

Since we strongly believe that this case is a hoax, we decided to share all of the Meier material (books, booklets, DVDs, etc) absolutely for free here, so that you can investigate and conclude it for yourselves. 

Frauds/Cults doesn't deserve to make money off innocents. They need to be exposed."

So far, the four torrent files they shared include:

Torrent #1: As The Time Fulfills (2012) - Michael Horn / Billy Meier

2012 - As The Time Fulfills
http://www.theyfly.com/asthetimefulfills.html

Torrent #2:  Michael Horn's videos on Billy Meier UFO Case - Batch 1 

1995 - Comedy at a Time Like This
http://www.scubbly.com/item/7294/

2004 - The Key To Our Future Survival
http://www.scubbly.com/item/7292/

2005 - Standing in Spirit
http://www.scubbly.com/item/7310/

2006 - Michael Horn at the Ontario Science Center in Canada
http://www.scubbly.com/item/51520/

2009 - Breaking the Silence
http://www.scubbly.com/item/7333/

2009 - Is Billy Meier the only real Contactee?
http://www.scubbly.com/item/7291/

2010 - Do you want the Truth or Entertainment - ASPE Conference, New Mexico
http://www.scubbly.com/item/51524/

Torrent #3: Michael Horn's videos on Billy Meier UFO Case - Batch 2 

2011 - Flying Saucers Cafe
http://www.scubbly.com/item/50735/
http://www.scubbly.com/item/50736/

The Conscious Media Network interviews Michael Horn
http://www.consciousmedia.co/interviews/mhorn1.htm
http://www.consciousmedia.co/interviews/mhorn2.htm

2014 - And did they Listen
http://www.scubbly.com/item/77469/

 2014 - The Spiritual Teaching in Everyday Life (included in the below DVD set)
http://www.scubbly.com/item/99201/

Torrent #4: Billy Meier/FIGU DVDs - Batch 1

Ausschnitte/Reportagen
https://shop.figu.org/multimedia/filme/ausschnitte-reportagen

Demonstrationsflüge
https://shop.figu.org/multimedia/filme/demonstrationsfl%C3%BCge

Mysterious Radio (October 16, 2016) - Interview with Michael Horn

LIVE SHOW TONIGHT-We discuss the amazing visits from beings from another planet with Billy Meier and the disturbingly accurate prophecies they told him of and what hell is to come if we don't do something now! 

Michael Horn-www.theyfly.com

Download: mp3
Source: Mysterious Radio

"New discovery": Black hole found wandering in Michael Horn's Brain

UFO-Prophet and BMUFOR wishes Michael Horn a speedy recovery

Yes, you heard it right!

A special team of neuroscientists, hurried from across the world to probe Michael Horn's (MH) imploding brain, made a stunning discovery -  the presence of a wandering black hole. They reported that many of the Michael's personality traits (rather disorders), exhibited both in online and real world, can be traced back to this malady. Some of these traits include:

1. Chronic fact deficiency
2. Truth-Intolerant
3. Acquired logic deficiency syndrome
4. Compulsive lying disorder
5. Histrionic personality disorder
6. Narcissistic personality disorder
7. Adult-bully syndrome
8. Little-man syndrome
9. Post-debunking denial disorder
10. Allergic to fact-checking
11. Aversion to skepticism
12. Stage 4 Self-deception
13. Messiah complex
14. Galileo Complex 
15. Intellectile dysfunction
16. Rationalize-anything syndrome
17. Reason deficit hyperquack disorder 
18. Conspiracy-tract infection*
19. Chronic fallacy malignancy
20. Science-resistant sclerosis

 
We don't simply have to take the scientists word for it, as some of the above given traits have been indisputably corroborated by Michael Horn's own articles published recently on October 11 and 12. They are:

1. Scientists Make Major “New Discovery” 28 Years AFTER Billy Meier
2. Billy Meier Scoops Scientists – by 35 YEARS – on Dangers of Space Travel

1. Scientists Make Major “New Discovery” 28 Years AFTER Billy Meier

Here MH argues that Meier, unlike the scientists who only theorized the existence of wandering/roaming/rogue black holes, instead has declared their existence as a fact in 1988 during his 223rd and 224th contacts with the Plejaren extraterrestrials.

When did scientists first confirm the existence of wandering black holes as a fact, according to MH?

According to MH, the existence of wandering black holes have been for the first time confirmed by scientists only in 2016 i.e. 28 years after Meier 'verifiably published' his information. And as evidence he cites a recent Russia Today article titled - ‘Wandering’ black hole spotted after intergalactic collision -  published on October 6, 2016.

He further stated that the concept of wandering black holes was not only 'strictly theoretical scientific conjecture' until now, but according to NASA these, with 'absolute certainty', doesn't wander at all.

Rebuttal:

Suppose, let us take everything MH stated regarding the purported corroboration articles at face value. Then the next obvious question would be:

Where is the evidence - copyrighted books - that Meier published his information on wandering black holes in 1988?

Of course MH didn't provide it in his article and he almost never does. WHY? The simple reason that MH almost never provides original scans of copyrighted pages and text pages is because if the date of the copyright is matched, then text won't match (or wouldn't exist at all) or if the text is matched, then the copyright/publication date won't match (would be published only after the fact/event was publicly known). According to the research conducted at BMUFOR on Meier's so-called 200+ "fulfilled" prophecies and predictions (ALL DEBUNKED), the notes for  the Contact Reports ranging between 197 and 231 was only first verifiably published in Plejadisch-Plejarische Kontaktberichte, Block 5 in 2004. This fact is known to MH years ago. Despite this, he still repeats the same lie. Looks like his articles are specifically tailored towards his gullible followers who instead of fact-checking would blindly believe whatever "fact" Meier or MH fabricates.

But even then MH could still claim that Meier has published it first, 12 years before our scientists did in 2016. Could it be true?

Before answering this question, first let us see what the 2016 news article actually says. This article never ever claimed a NEW DISCOVERY of a wandering black hole. In fact the article itself (see excerpt below) clearly points to the fact that there have been a few similar wandering black holes detected earlier.

"Astronomers have previously spotted a few similar black holes but never anything on the scale of this latest discovery. Data showed XJ1417+52 about ten times brighter than the brightest X-ray source ever seen for a wandering black hole."

Even in MH's own article, he cites a 2001 BBC article (3 years before Meier published his contact notes for the first time in 2004) reporting a discovery of a black hole wandering at 6,000 light-years from Earth, as evidence on the existence of wandering black holes. If this is the case, then why would MH cite the 2016 article again as corroboration? Dementia? Possible. Stupidity? More likely.

Also it is totally laughable seeing MH's biased mind set at work. He points to a NASA article which he thinks states that black holes with 'absolute certainty', doesn't wander at all. His evidence?

He cites a NASA Education article written for school kids ranging between grades 5 and 8. Even though he didn't explicitly point out the excerpt but it is definitely the following one:

"Could a Black Hole Destroy Earth?
Black holes do not wander around the universe, randomly swallowing worlds. They follow the laws of gravity just like other objects in space. The orbit of a black hole would have to be very close to the solar system to affect Earth, which is not likely. (..)"


Did you see what MH did there? He cherry picked what he wanted to see and ignored the 2nd sentence which gives the 1st sentence its total intended meaning which is that black holes don't just wander randomly around the Universe but would only wander along fixed orbits decided by laws of gravity of other objects in its vicinity. Stupidity defined!

Now let us anyway answer the hypothetical question - If Meier really had published his information in 1988 as MH (fradulently) still asserts, would it still be considered as evidence of his contacts with ETs?

The earliest papers on the theoretical study of runaway – stellar black holes or supermassive black holes that we could find, come from decades ago since 1970′s. Just google these words – black holes, roaming, wandering, runaway, ejection, recoil – and you will find doznes of papers published since 1970′s. Most of the astronomical information (valid to many fields of science) which we today consider as scientific facts have come to be as such only after decades of conjecture and multiple observations. Predicting such things which are considered scientifically likely with abundant theoretical evidence, cannot be considered as strong evidence of advance knowledge.

2. Billy Meier Scoops Scientists – by 35 YEARS – on Dangers of Space Travel

Here MH claims that Meier has published information on the negative effects of space travel for the first time in 1981 (150th contact) which however was only corroborated by scientists decades later in 2012 and 2016 (35 years later). This, according to MH, proves Meier is in contact with extraterrestrials.

Rebuttal:

When did Meier first verifiably publish this information?

Meier only published this information in Semjase Kontakt Berichte, 2nd ed. Vol. 11 in 1994 and not in 1981 as MH wanted all of us to believe. We already know too much regarding his fradulent tactics to fall for them. Even now, MH could still argue that Meier has preemptively published his information first in 1994 i.e. 18 years or 22 years before scientists confirmed it. Could it be true?

As it turns out, many papers and articles have been published about the impact of space travel on the human body and the especially the brain. Following is an excerpt from the Lawrence Journal World newspaper from June 8, 1963:

“Hallucinations, impaired judgment and permanent brain and bone damage are possible hazards of prolonged space flight scientists say.”

News article referring to other negative effects can be read here on BMUFOR.

Conclusion

The above two rebuttals thus adequately "scientifically" corroborate the fact that MH is suffering from 20+ debilitating personality disorders. This connection is even made more clear when MH was confronted on his embarrassing wandering black hole article at Bellgab forum by one of its users with facts which any rational person could easily decipher. What was MH's response?

"Yeah, blah, blah, blah, deny, blah, blah, etc."

Looks like the wandering black hole in MH's brain is sucking away the remaining brain tissue, stripping MH of his limited cognitive capacity. Either that or his post-debunking denial disorder is really progressing rapidly.

Further in MH's 2nd article, he claims that it is plain impossibility for Meier to have obtained his "specific, prophetically accurate scientific information" any other way than through his contacts with the people of this advanced, space traveling human race. 

He then asks a couple of rhetorical questions:

1. How did you he do it, before it was known, before it occurred, before the computer and internet?   
2. Really, by what means did this man obtain and publish all of the specific, accurate, non-theoretical, scientific and other information such as is found here?

On the first question, we already have demonstrated that Meier never ever published information before the events/discoveries were known or occurred. 

And regarding the second question, the way MH framed it makes it seem like according to him, before the time of computer and internet, there were no sources of knowledge, no libraries, no book stores, no TV shows broadcasting scientific news and documentaries, no science magazines/paper subscriptions, etc. This of course is absolutely laughable. What is even more laughable or rather firm evidence of MH's INTENTIONAL FRAUD is the fact that he himself visited Meier and shot hours of footage for his 2007 documentary - The Silent Revolution of Truth. And in one of the shots, we can see Meier walking through his PERSONAL LIBRARY holding hundreds of books. Here is one frame from that scene:

In addition, Kal Korff during his Switzerland visit in 1991 has found out that Meier along with his group members regularly visits a near by book store and buy several books on subjects like space, science, history, astronomy, photography, etc. And the final nail in the coffin is (self) hit by none other than Meier himself. In his 222nd contact report, he stated the following:

“Billy:
...Sfath taught me a lot of knowledge in this respect, but on the other hand, I also learned a lot at school – even though I was a big truant – and moreover, I’m also learning constantly through professional books, professional articles in newspapers and magazines, as well as through professional television broadcasts."

MH of course is aware of this mountain of counter evidence but remains silent instead of rebutting it because he doesn't want to make his followers aware of these self-damaging facts that would expose his lies and fraud. More details on this blatant deception are revealed at BMUFOR here.

Sacrificing truth for fame and money?

 

* MH recently published a blog article - Billy Meier UFO Case Censored Again. Why? - claiming that the disruptions during his interview with the host Natalie-Marie Hart and the videos final disappearance must have to do with governmental, corporate, political or religious factions. He claims that this was done to keep his information from reaching the younger generations that most need to have access to it. As it turns out, according to the host herself, it is none other than she who took it out for reasons explained on her fb page.

Here is funny but appropriate response by a member of Bellgab to MH's claim of censorship:

"Wow. Me oh My.

I have heard you say on occasion that you are not a conspiracy theorist. You. Not a conspiracy theorist. The person who claims MUFON and like groups, Michael Moore and prominent journalists, Michio Kaku and Neil Degrasse Tyson, all refuse to discuss Meier for fear of ridicule/loosing their jobs...

You literally think the whole world - and several additional worlds - are out to suppress your message. You. The non-conspiracy theorist.

I don't know, perhaps you are on to something. So, the technical difficulties your young new friend had...which in fact were easily remedied ... for the benefit of her 4,000 strong audience...yeah, who knows, seems like something that nefarious "they" would occupy themselves with (and then ultimately fail at?). Wait, so they just wanted to make this poor girl have another hours worth of work or something?  This was the nature of the scheming of the "them"?  Very curious. Interesting that "they" would act (ineffectually) in this instance, and yet leave you and your galactically important message unmolested during your numerous coast to coast appearances which reach, what, a million plus people...?

The Lord... The aliens... The MIB... Horn's mind works in mysterious ways..."

P.S.:  And by the way, Meier's information seems to have been once again debunked recently. According to Meier, during the new reincarnation process, the newly procreated, growing human embryo is reanimated on the 21st day by the reincarnating spirit form that has returned from the Beyond (aka afterlife/spirit realm) to this temporal life, whereupon the heart of the embryo starts to beat and the development of the basic character begins.. But as it turns out, according to recent research conducted at University of Oxford, the human heart may actually start to beat as early as 16 days.

Texas UFOs (October 6, 2016): Interview with Michael Horn

I had the pleasure to interview Michael Horn, the official representative of the famous Billy Meier UFO case, discussed on programs like Coast to Coast AM, CNN, Fox News Radio, the Kevin Smith Show, and more. Mr. Horn discusses Meier's contacts with an alien race called the Plejarens, US Presidents interest in UFOs and aliens, predictions of Civil War in the US, the purpose of various prophets in ancient history, the good intentions of aliens, Roswell, and more.

Do you have questions for Michael? Share them in the comments, tweet them to me (@txufosightings, use hashtag# ufojane, or email: texasufosightings@gmail.com).


Watch: youtube
Source: texasufosighting

Hoax Hunter (October 1, 2016): 23 Proofs Billy Meier Is A Hoaxer

Billy Meier UFO Hoaxer of the 1970s Alien ET Contactee wannabe is busted debunked and completely proven to be a liar in 22 side by side comparisons of his photos which most are claimed to have been taken in space while on board of an ET space ship, are actually photos of mundane things from his TV, many photos originating at NASA.

Watch: Hoax Hunter

NEW PARADIGM SHIFT 5D EVENT (September 16, 2016): Michael Horn's presentation

FEATURED KEYNOTE SPEAKER MICHAEL HORN,
The Billy Meier ET Contacts

ET AND UFO PANEL SPEAKER THURSDAY SEPT 15TH FROM 6:00 PM TO 8:00 PM HOSTED BY SEAN DAVID MORTON

WORKSHOP 1:

ALL ABOUT BILLY MEIER CASE YOU NEED TO KNOW
FRIDAY SEPT 16TH FROM 6:00 PM TO 8:00 PM CAMPUS ROOM

WORKSHOP 2: 

ALL ABOUT BILLY MEIER CASE YOU NEED TO KNOW SATURDAY SEPT 16TH 9:00 AM TO 9:50 AM Berkeley Room

LECTURE:

BILLY MEIER FUTURE PROPHECIES GIVEN BY PLEAJAREN
SUNDAY SEPT 18TH FROM 12:00 NOON TO 1:30 PM

Michael Horn is the world's leading expert on scientifically proven extraterrestrial UFOs and contact. He represents the Billy Meier UFO contact case, ongoing for almost 75 years in Switzerland. Meier's evidence includes over 1,200 still irreproducible UFO photos, films and video, as well as sound recordings and metal alloy samples. Meier is also the source of the most abundant, specific, prophetically accurate information in history.

Michael's presentations will also focus on the already fulfilled prophecies and predictions, which Meier began publishing over 65 years ago, as well as the very specific warnings pertaining to the near future pertaining to:

The upcoming election
Two civil wars coming to America
The worldwide spread of fundamentalist terrorism
The EU-US agenda to bio-chip everyone on the planet
The danger of a US-provoked nuclear war with Russia
Unprecedented environmental upheavals
The now fulfilling signs of the coming San Francisco mega-quake

The reason for the Meier contacts was to help us assure our own very threatened future survival. And the most important element of all, is the non-religious, belief-free spiritual teaching. 

Website:theyfly.com

Source: AlienEvent
Watch: youtube/randyarena (excerpt from WORKSHOP 2)

Note: I will update as soon as the complete video presentation of Meier case at this event is made available online.