Worldwide UFO Controversy (June 10, 2018): WCUFO and Conclusions - Part 3 (Final)

The final part of the Worldwide UFO Controversy. Evidence about the Wedding Cake UFO. Final conclusions about the purpose of this controversy.

Watch: youtube/rhalzahi

'Evidence of fraud discovered again: Billy Meier's spaceship photos' - JUFOF Nr. 122 (February 1999)

German UFO researcher, Hans-Werner Peiniger has published an article - Wieder Hinweise auf Schwindel entdeckt: Billy Meiers Raumschiff-Fotos / Evidence of fraud discovered again: Billy Meier's spaceship photos - in his Journal für UFO-Forschung (JUFOF), Nr. 122, February, 1999.

Billy Meier's "Wedding-cake" UFO or WCUFO

Comparison of Meier's WCUFO parts with flower pot-holder and bookshelf-pins

Comparison of Meier's WCUFO with the garbage can lid

 

Comparison of Meier's WCUFO with the garbage can lid

For complete article, read: JUFOF Nr. 122 (this text is extracted from a reprint, from JUFOF Nr. 185, pgs. 148-151, May 2009)
My sincere thanks to Hans-Werner Peiniger for sharing all his JUFOF articles on Meier case with me.

Further reading:
Die Reporter (Pro7 TV, May 27, 1999): German UFO researcher deconstructs Billy Meier's WCUFO and Asket-Nera photos

BMUFOR: Exposé of Billy Meier by his ex-wife Kalliope

Billy Meier and his now ex-wife, Kalliope Zafiriou; circa 1980

After Kalliope left Meier and his community in mid-1990's, Meier reportedly forbade her to give any information concerning the background of his “extraterrestrial experiences” to the Swiss writer, publicist, and journalist, Luc Bürgin. She of course, defied his orders and gave interviews to Luc Bürgin, and also to author and researcher Kal Korff and UFO researcher, Hans-Werner Peiniger.

• Luc Bürgin – UFO-Kurier, Nr. 30, April 1997
• Hans-Werner Peiniger –  Journal für UFO-Forschung (JUFOF), Nr. 111, March 1997 (interviewed in May 1997)
• Luc Bürgin – UFO-Kurier, Nr. 43, May 1998
• Luc Bürgin and Kal Korff – Part 1 and Part 2 (aired on FOX network) December 28, 1998

Our sincere thanks to Hans-Werner Peiniger, President of GEP (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens/Society for the investigation of the UFO phenomenon) for sharing articles on Meier case from GEP’s in-house journal JUFOF (Journal für UFO-Forschung/Journal for UFO Investigation). Likewise, our sincere thanks also extends to the author Luc Bürgin and Waltraud Neher, Executive Assistant at Kopp Verlag (German non-fiction publisher), for sharing their UFO-Kurier articles.

Visit the BMUFOR article on - KALLIOPE ZAFIRIOU - for a brief summary of the information conveyed (or implied) by Kalliope during her interviews, distinguished by topics.

p.s: Billy Meier may be the most infamous hoaxer and plagiarizer, but UFO-Prophet takes this opportunity to wish Meier a very happy birthday. Meier was born on Febraury 3, 1937. Today he becomes an 80-year old man.

Die Reporter (Pro7 TV, May 27, 1999): German UFO researcher deconstructs Billy Meier's WCUFO and Asket-Nera photos

 

 Watch: youtube/TheBillyMeierUFOCase

While watching the segment on WCUFO in the video, one may notice an interesting finding. A flower-pot dish was shown close to the camera @ 6:25 min! What about it?

The background story is that Michael Horn several years ago has published an article - Looking Closer and Deeper at the WCUFO - where he states that the "analysis" conducted by a Billy Meier supporter named Dyson Device (from Australia) debunks the skeptics argument that the Wedding Cake UFO (or WCUFO in short) is just a small scale model made from garbage can lid, adjustable bookshelf pins, pressure cooker lid, christmas ornaments like metallic spheres and several other easily available household items as listed here.(Later in the article he states that no one has ever tried to duplicate Meier's WCUFO images. It seems this article must have been published before Phil Langdon proved the above Michael Horn's claim wrong.)

In that article, Dyson Devine makes the following three arguments and conclude that the flower-pot dish and the top part of Meier's WCUFO do not match, which according to him and Michael Horn, vindicates Meier of constructing a small scale model:

1. By doing a side-by-side comparison of the two images, the item on the top of the WCUFO is shown to have different proportions relative to the flower pot dish.
2. The number of "star-fish" motifs in any single column on the top item of the WCUFO is 5, while the number is 4 for the flower-pot dish.
3. The number of "star-fish" columns between two fixed points on WCUFO is more than the number of columns on a flower-pot dish.

Based on these differences, Dyson Devine and Michael Horn assert the following:

'Close, but no cigar. This is very very typical of the whole of the Plejaren ET enlightenment methodology. They deliberately fool the vast majority in order to protect their psyches from the potentially devastating (only for them!) truth about the REAL extraterrestrial presence, and supply more than ample substantiating evidence for the tiny minority who look just a LITTLE deeper into things.'

'It is a valuable lesson in the need for thoroughness and thinking for oneself, as well as providing the required controversy. Very wise/loving, these Plejaren, and not without a certain appealing sense of humour.'

The idea that the only way the Plejaren have come up in order to demonstrate reasonable proof of their existence for the vast majority of the earth people is by deliberately discrediting themselves - is beyond ridiculous and seems to be the last resort for the believers to reconcile with the dubious and negative evidence. This contrived theory is even being strongly opposed by none other than Meier himself.

Posted by Michael_d on FIGU forum, October 30, 2006:

Hello Billy,

The concept of plausible deniability is often mentioned with your contact case as a rationalization for the Plejarans intentionally lying and obfuscating the truth. J.W. Deardorff, author of Celestial Teachings: The Emergence of the True Testament of Jmmanuel, has published a short paper on this topic at www.tjresearch.info/denial.htm. The reason given for the Plejarans lying is that it serves to intentionally weaken your contact case so that it is not completely air-tight or irrefutable, like ET’s landing on the White House lawn. The purported benefit of plausible deniability is to give refuge to the illogical and weak-minded people that are not equipped to accept the validity of your contact case based on its preponderance of evidence. Other reasons given for lying is that it prevents the Plejarans from being looked upon as gods, or you from being considered a spiritual guru, because who would trust a liar.
Here is my only question:
Do you or the Plejarans lie and obfuscate the truth to maintain this alibi of plausible deniability?
Thank you.

Answer

The Plejaren never lied but always spoke about that which they know/knew or thought to be true. If it turned out that what they had looked upon as true, but later turned out to be different etc., they were correcting themselves.
They did not always explain everything they know, but only disclosed parts of information.
On other instances they just answered the questions, but since the questions weren’t precise, they were able to withhold information, etc. etc.

Posted by Mahigitam on FIGU forum, March 23, 2014:


Dear Billy,

Retired Professor James Deardorff has proposed a theory which you may already know, its called as "Leaky Embargo Hypothesis". According to his hypothesis, advanced ethical ETs would not reveal their existence as it would create shock to lower civilizations from sudden disclosures. So these ETs like Plejaren would select a contactee on a planet and through him pass on the message to the people who are ready or interested.As a part of this strategy, Deardorff seems to have stated the "negative" aspects of the case like - missing original negatives, films, slides, outerspace photos, Asket-Nera issue, letting MIB, CIA,..etc manipulate or steal the original evidence, absence of & negative evidence of astronomical details(Malona, destroyer comet, origins of venus & moon, dark star in SOL system,..etc), Clear contradiction of values with scientific results, Cave men photos still being in PPKB,..etc - are purposefully introduced or let them to exist by Plejaren in order for people to spot these & give the chance to refuse the reality the case so that they can save them from the shock of ET existence.

I would like to know, if such a strategy(not necessarily related to the above details) was being used or has been used by Plejaren with or without your knowledge ?

p.s: Everything above may not be attributed to deardorff.

Answer

The „Leaky Embargo Hypothesis“ is pure nonsense. The Plejaren always informed openly and honestly, of course only within the limits of their directives. And when at some later time they learned that formerly given information turned out as being erroneous (due to a lack of certain knowledge on their side, etc.), they always corrected their former incomplete or false information. What can be stated with certainty: They never lied.  

Furthermore, Meier along with the Plejaren have explicitly stated many dozens of times throughout the contact notes that they have provided enough evidence for open-minded persons and scientists to remove all of their doubts and come to the conclusion that Meier must be in contact with ETs.

For example see this information from Contact Report 130, Saturday, May 31, 1980, 2:18 AM:

Semjase:
(..)
233. This can only happen by my giving you opportunity to obtain such clear film and photo material that any doubt will be removed – even for the terrestrial scientists.    
234. We have to hurry very much with all these things, however, because in America, the first steps have already been taken to analyze these falsified old films more closely, and the possibility exists that the artificial lines manipulated into them will be found, at least in those slides and parts of the film that exhibit these lines more distinctly.    
235. For this reason, you will have to take new pictures as soon as possible, which leave nothing more to be desired in clarity of reality. 

Want to guess what these 'new pictures' were that were supposed to remove 'any doubt..for the terrestrial scientists'?
They concern the pictures of Wedding cake UFO! And we all know how that turned out. See this and this link for more information on the deconstruction of Meier's WCUFO.

Now lets get back to the three main points put forth by Dyson Devine. The central premise of Dyson and Michael Horn's argument is that since the flower-pot dish is "demonstrated" to have been different in proportions relative to the WCUFO, then the Meier's WCUFO must be ET.

Even if we accept their premise as true, I don't see how that is going to prove the ET nature of the object. Why is it impossible for a different sized flower-pot dish with the star-fish design on it to exist, that matches the skeptics proposed measurement for the small scale model hypothesis? I don't see any reason for the flower-pot dishes with starfish designs not to come in different sizes. Perhaps Michael and Dyson can explain their exotic reasoning for us.

Now lets discuss the logic behind their three arguments.

1. By doing a side-by-side comparison of the two images, the item on the top of the WCUFO is shown to have different proportions relative to the flower pot dish.

Refer to Michael Horn's article on how Dyson approached the comparison test. The obvious question is how could he judge the potential differences of objects proportions in two images that are photographed from different distances (to the subject), camera settings, type of camera lens and perspectives. It is basic knowledge that all these factors would distort the shape of the object, which essentially makes any efforts for a legitimate comparison worthless.

When I have pointed the above objections to a professional photographer (who like to remain anonymous) with nearly 35 years of experience and who also has been studying the Meier case since 1977, has confirmed them and further stated the following :

"..yes of course, the distortions caused by magnifying lenses are a factor due to the fact that all lenses have some amount of what is called "barrel distortion" and that in order for an object to appear the same size on an image, the camera must be placed at different distances depending on the focal length.  Therefore if you took a picture of the same object using a short and then a long focal length lens and adjusted the subject to lens distance so the object occupies the same space on the picture, the proportions of the object will change substantially.
A good demonstration of this is that longer focal length lenses are often referred to as "portrait" lenses because they tend to not cause disproportion effects on the face, whereas using a wide angle lens for portraits results in serious distortion where for example the nose will look substantially bigger than it is.
Here is a perfect example of how lens focal length causes changes in the proportions of the face:
http://jonhaverstickstudio.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Cat-Wide-angle-v-tele1.jpg or this:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OkQTZ6roYnM/TduWtxGZv1I/AAAAAAAAAwg/TW-icPz-ApY/s1600/portrait_sample.jpg" 

2. The number of "star-fish" motifs in any single column on the top item of the WCUFO is 5, while the number is 4 for the flower-pot dish.

The below image is a screenshot (at 6:25 min) from the 1999 TV segment, where the German UFO researcher Roger Eglin shows a flower-pot dish (that is different to the one on Michael Horn's website, likely taken form now-defunct Turkish website as mentioned here) along with 3 other different household objects that resembles the parts in Meier's WCUFO. One can see that there are 5 starfish in each column, just like the top part in Meier's WCUFO shown above.

3. The number of "star-fish" columns between two fixed points on WCUFO is more than the number of columns on a flower-pot dish.


While it is true that the number of starfish columns between any two fixed points (I calculated between the two indentations on the rim) is different between the flower-pot dish and WCUFO, it is most certainly possible that there do exist a flower-pot dish that have the same 5-row starfish design and also match the number of starfish columns between any two fixed points.

"Wedding Cake" UFO (WCUFO) in Times Square, New York City (Oct 2014)

Source: theyflyblog

UFO Aliens: The Deadly Secret (2006) - by Jonathan Gray

 

 

Buy book: beforeus/aliens

Rhal Zahi's Analysis - WCUFO (March 2013), Pendulum UFO (Jan 2014) & Energy Ships (Aug 30, 2014)

'Wedding cake' UFO

1981

Analysis: WCUFO & Night-time WCUFO

Pendulum UFO

Analysis: Pendulum UFO

 Energy Ships

#718, April 19, 1979, 2:25 AM

#719, April 19, 1979, 2:25 AM

#720, April 19, 1979, 2:40 AM

#724, June 22, 1979, 5:25 AM

#725, June 22, 1979, 5:25 AM

#726, June 23, 1979, 4:10 AM

#727, June 23, 1979, 4:16 AM

#728, June 23, 1979, 4:20 AM

Analysis: Energy Ships

About: Rhal Zahi & Author's Den

ARCHIVES PROJECT: Received 4th & final Box, sent by James Deardorff (Aug 6, 2014)

We are very glad to announce you that Research Professor Emeritus(OSU) - James W. Deardorff has sent us a 4th and final box of Meier case material with postage fees already paid at his end with $ 62.65, which was received on Aug 6, 2014. See below for the list of material.

Books: (7)

Talmud Jmmanuel - 1 (1978, 109 pgs, German)
Talmud Jmmanuel - 1 (1984, 124 pgs, English)
The Talmud of Jmmanuel - 1 (1992, 300 pgs, German-English)
The Talmud of Jmmanuel - 1 (1996, 300 pgs, German-English)
The Talmud of Jmmanuel - 1 (2001, 274 pgs, German-English)
Talmud Jmmanuel - 1 (2007, 281 pgs, German-English)
Celestial Teachings - 1 (1990, 324 pgs)


Photo Albums: (2)

Beamships - 23 photos
'Wedding cake' UFO (WCUFO) - 17 photos

Cosmic Vision News (July 26, 2014): Michael Horn & Rhal Zahi

Listen/Download: MP3 (between 59m:15s - 1h:15m:40s)
Source: CVN

Third Phase of Moon (Feb 20, 2014): Interview with Michael Horn

Could Billy Meier Have The Smoking Gun Evidence We Are Not Alone? We At Thirdphaseofmoon Will Ask The Question In Future Episodes With Michael Horn American Representitive of Billy Meier visit Website http://www.theyfly.com/ Quote From Billy Meier "The purpose of our life is for us to evolve - the advancement and continued development of our being at a constant pace to ever higher levels. The purpose of evolution lies within the concept of achieving the highest possible human development, including love, harmony, ability, knowledge and wisdom. Evolution not only serves to bring human entities to a high level of knowledge and wisdom so they may lead a life in harmony with Creation's laws and directives and the like: Through our evolution we also assist Creation with Its own evolution. Just as humans and nearly all life is in need of evolutionary advancement, so, too, is Creation, the Universal Consciousness. Even Creation is only relatively perfect and It must evolve to ascend to higher forms of Its own existence. And to achieve Its objective, Creation requires human beings who evolve over the course of billions of years into pure-spirit-forms and from these into still higher forms of existence, extending through to the Petale level. There occurs the transition into Creation, into the Universal Consciousness, and transpires the unification, the "becoming one." In this manner Creation assimilates these former human spirit forms, which have by then evolved to their own highest level and which, initially, had originated from Creation in order for It to evolve through these human entities. During their unification with Creation, all the accumulated knowledge and wisdom are also absorbed by Creation, and thus It elevates Its own evolution by a fraction of an iota, and advances some time later into the next higher Creation level. After an incredibly long time, this subsequent Creation continues evolving until it becomes one with the Absolute Absolutum. The Absolute Absolutum is the highest level and all-encompassing form a Creation can attain, and yet even the Absolute Absolutum must continue Its evolution process into all-Great-Time and chronological endlessness."

http://www.theyfly.com/newproducts/newproducts.html..
http://www.theyfly.com/and-did-they-listen
www.theyflyblog.com

Watch: Youtube/Thirdphaseofmoon

New Analysis of WCUFO ( Feb 2014): by Rhal Zahi

Here we show the latest analysis of high resolution pictures of the WCUFO. It shows it was a big object of 7 meters in diameter. So, there were several UFOs like this one, at different sizes.

Note: The pole and the grass would only appear clearly(when enhanced in photoshop), for the high-res photos of WCUFO which were only recently released. To see some of these hi-res photos, visit this link.


Watch: FIGUTV
Source: Rhal Zahi

Rare never-before-seen Hi-Res Wedding Cake UFO photos (WCUFO)

Download Hi-Res Photos: Dropbox
More: Theyfly

Investigating the Billy Meier UFO Case (Sep 2, 2011): Derek Bartholomaus at Skeptrack, Dragon Con

Since 2003, Derek Bartholomaus has been researching the various extra-terrestrial contact claims made by Swiss farmer, Eduard Albert “Billy” Meier, with a skeptical, and critical, eye. His research has now been collected onto a new website: The Billy Meier UFO Case.  Derek is going to be discussing his research as part of the Skeptics Track at Dragon*Con 2011 in Atlanta, Georgia this coming Labor Day weekend.
Dragon*Con is the largest multi-media, popular culture convention focusing on science fiction and fantasy, gaming, comics, literature, art, music, and film in the universe! SkepTrack is a complement of live entertainment and discussion panels for the legions of free thinkers, science enthusiasts and skeptics helping to put the Science in Science Fiction at Dragon*Con. On Friday, September 2, 2011 at 5:30 PM in Hilton Hotel Meeting Room 205/206/207, Derek Bartholomaus will be presenting an overview of his involvement in the Billy Meier UFO Case. Throughout the years claims have been made by Billy Meier, and his supporters, that Derek has successfully shown to be inaccurate. For example, Meier claims to have predicted an accident at a nuclear power station in France in 2003 that shut down the reactor. Derek was able to show that, not only was there no accident at the power station, the reactor was not shut down.
One of the highlights that will be discussed at Dragon*Con concerns the work conducted by Phil Langdon, from the United Kingdom, who has been able to successfully recreate all of the various Billy Meier photographs and movies. His reproduction work is so accurate that it also finally answered a thirty-year-old question about the case. This answer, and much more, will be discussed at Dragon*Con 2011 on Friday, September 2 at 5:30 PM in Hilton Hotel Meeting Room 205/206/207 in Atlanta, Georgia.
The Billy Meier UFO Case is the home of the research conducted by Derek Bartholomaus into the alleged extra-terrestrial contacts of Eduard Albert “Billy” Meier. 
Visit our website at http://www.BillyMeierUFOCase.com or call (323) 364-2596.

Article Source: PRWeb, Aug 25, 2011
Watch: Disclose.tv/maheshkarumudi
Video Source: Skeptrack or Vimeo