Friday, October 14, 2016

"New discovery": Black hole found wandering in Michael Horn's Brain

UFO-Prophet and BMUFOR wishes Michael Horn a speedy recovery

Yes, you heard it right!

A special team of neuroscientists, hurried from across the world to probe Michael Horn's (MH) imploding brain, made a stunning discovery -  the presence of a wandering black hole. They reported that many of the Michael's personality traits (rather disorders), exhibited both in online and real world, can be traced back to this malady. Some of these traits include:
  1. Chronic fact deficiency
  2. Truth-Intolerant
  3. Acquired logic deficiency syndrome
  4. Compulsive lying disorder
  5. Histrionic personality disorder
  6. Narcissistic personality disorder
  7. Adult-bully syndrome
  8. Little-man syndrome
  9. Post-debunking denial disorder
  10. Allergic to fact-checking
  11. Aversion to skepticism
  12. Stage 4 Self-deception
  13. Messiah complex
  14. Galileo Complex 
  15. Intellectile dysfunction
  16. Rationalize-anything syndrome
  17. Reason deficit hyperquack disorder 
  18. Conspiracy-tract infection*
  19. Chronic fallacy malignancy
  20. Science-resistant sclerosis
We don't simply have to take the scientists word for it, as some of the above given traits have been indisputably corroborated by Michael Horn's own articles published recently on October 11 and 12. They are:
  1. Scientists Make Major “New Discovery” 28 Years AFTER Billy Meier
  2. Billy Meier Scoops Scientists – by 35 YEARS – on Dangers of Space Travel

1. Scientists Make Major “New Discovery” 28 Years AFTER Billy Meier

Here MH argues that Meier, unlike the scientists who only theorized the existence of wandering/roaming/rogue black holes, instead has declared their existence as a fact in 1988 during his 223rd and 224th contacts with the Plejaren extraterrestrials.

When did scientists first confirm the existence of wandering black holes as a fact, according to MH?

According to MH, the existence of wandering black holes have been for the first time confirmed by scientists only in 2016 i.e. 28 years after Meier 'verifiably published' his information. And as evidence he cites a recent Russia Today article titled - ‘Wandering’ black hole spotted after intergalactic collision -  published on October 6, 2016.

He further stated that the concept of wandering black holes was not only 'strictly theoretical scientific conjecture' until now, but according to NASA these, with 'absolute certainty', doesn't wander at all.


Suppose, let us take everything MH stated regarding the purported corroboration articles at face value. Then the next obvious question would be:

Where is the evidence - copyrighted books - that Meier published his information on wandering black holes in 1988?

Of course MH didn't provide it in his article and he almost never does. WHY? The simple reason that MH almost never provides original scans of copyrighted pages and text pages is because if the date of the copyright is matched, then text won't match (or wouldn't exist at all) or if the text is matched, then the copyright/publication date won't match (would be published only after the fact/event was publicly known). According to the research conducted at BMUFOR on Meier's so-called 200+ "fulfilled" prophecies and predictions (ALL DEBUNKED), the notes for  the Contact Reports ranging between 197 and 231 was only first verifiably published in Plejadisch-Plejarische Kontaktberichte, Block 5 in 2004. This fact is known to MH years ago. Despite this, he still repeats the same lie. Looks like his articles are specifically tailored towards his gullible followers who instead of fact-checking would blindly believe whatever "fact" Meier or MH fabricates.

But even then MH could still claim that Meier has published it first, 12 years before our scientists did in 2016. Could it be true?

Before answering this question, first let us see what the 2016 news article actually says. This article never ever claimed a NEW DISCOVERY of a wandering black hole. In fact the article itself (see excerpt below) clearly points to the fact that there have been a few similar wandering black holes detected earlier.

"Astronomers have previously spotted a few similar black holes but never anything on the scale of this latest discovery. Data showed XJ1417+52 about ten times brighter than the brightest X-ray source ever seen for a wandering black hole."

Even in MH's own article, he cites a 2001 BBC article (3 years before Meier published his contact notes for the first time in 2004) reporting a discovery of a black hole wandering at 6,000 light-years from Earth, as evidence on the existence of wandering black holes. If this is the case, then why would MH cite the 2016 article again as corroboration? Dementia? Possible. Stupidity? More likely.

Also it is totally laughable seeing MH's biased mind set at work. He points to a NASA article which he thinks states that black holes with 'absolute certainty', doesn't wander at all. His evidence?

He cites a NASA Education article written for school kids ranging between grades 5 and 8. Even though he didn't explicitly point out the excerpt but it is definitely the following one:

"Could a Black Hole Destroy Earth?
Black holes do not wander around the universe, randomly swallowing worlds. They follow the laws of gravity just like other objects in space. The orbit of a black hole would have to be very close to the solar system to affect Earth, which is not likely. (..)"

Did you see what MH did there? He cherry picked what he wanted to see and ignored the 2nd sentence which gives the 1st sentence its total intended meaning which is that black holes don't just wander randomly around the Universe but would only wander along fixed orbits decided by laws of gravity of other objects in its vicinity. Stupidity defined!

Now let us anyway answer the hypothetical question - If Meier really had published his information in 1988 as MH (fradulently) still asserts, would it still be considered as evidence of his contacts with ETs?

The earliest papers on the theoretical study of runaway – stellar black holes or supermassive black holes that we could find, come from decades ago since 1970′s. Just google these words – black holes, roaming, wandering, runaway, ejection, recoil – and you will find doznes of papers published since 1970′s. Most of the astronomical information (valid to many fields of science) which we today consider as scientific facts have come to be as such only after decades of conjecture and multiple observations. Predicting such things which are considered scientifically likely with abundant theoretical evidence, cannot be considered as strong evidence of advance knowledge.

2. Billy Meier Scoops Scientists – by 35 YEARS – on Dangers of Space Travel

Here MH claims that Meier has published information on the negative effects of space travel for the first time in 1981 (150th contact) which however was only corroborated by scientists decades later in 2012 and 2016 (35 years later). This, according to MH, proves Meier is in contact with extraterrestrials.


When did Meier first verifiably publish this information?

Meier only published this information in Semjase Kontakt Berichte, 2nd ed. Vol. 11 in 1994 and not in 1981 as MH wanted all of us to believe. We already know too much regarding his fradulent tactics to fall for them. Even now, MH could still argue that Meier has preemptively published his information first in 1994 i.e. 18 years or 22 years before scientists confirmed it. Could it be true?

As it turns out, many papers and articles have been published about the impact of space travel on the human body and the especially the brain. Following is an excerpt from the Lawrence Journal World newspaper from June 8, 1963:

“Hallucinations, impaired judgment and permanent brain and bone damage are possible hazards of prolonged space flight scientists say.”

News article referring to other negative effects can be read here on BMUFOR.


The above two rebuttals thus adequately "scientifically" corroborate the fact that MH is suffering from 20+ debilitating personality disorders. This connection is even made more clear when MH was confronted on his embarrassing wandering black hole article at Bellgab forum by one of its users with facts which any rational person could easily decipher. What was MH's response?

"Yeah, blah, blah, blah, deny, blah, blah, etc."

Looks like the wandering black hole in MH's brain is sucking away the remaining brain tissue, stripping MH of his limited cognitive capacity. Either that or his post-debunking denial disorder is really progressing rapidly.

Further in MH's 2nd article, he claims that it is plain impossibility for Meier to have obtained his "specific, prophetically accurate scientific information" any other way than through his contacts with the people of this advanced, space traveling human race. 

He then asks a couple of rhetorical questions:
  1. How did you he do it, before it was known, before it occurred, before the computer and internet?   
  2. Really, by what means did this man obtain and publish all of the specific, accurate, non-theoretical, scientific and other information such as is found here?

On the first question, we already have demonstrated that Meier never ever published information before the events/discoveries were known or occurred. 

And regarding the second question, the way MH framed it makes it seem like according to him, before the time of computer and internet, there were no sources of knowledge, no libraries, no book stores, no TV shows broadcasting scientific news and documentaries, no science magazines/paper subscriptions, etc. This of course is absolutely laughable. What is even more laughable or rather firm evidence of MH's INTENTIONAL FRAUD is the fact that he himself visited Meier and shot hours of footage for his 2007 documentary - The Silent Revolution of Truth. And in one of the shots, we can see Meier walking through his PERSONAL LIBRARY holding hundreds of books. Here is one frame from that scene:

In addition, Kal Korff during his Switzerland visit in 1991 has found out that Meier along with his group members regularly visits a near by book store and buy several books on subjects like space, science, history, astronomy, photography, etc. And the final nail in the coffin is (self) hit by none other than Meier himself. In his 222nd contact report, he stated the following:

...Sfath taught me a lot of knowledge in this respect, but on the other hand, I also learned a lot at school – even though I was a big truant – and moreover, I’m also learning constantly through professional books, professional articles in newspapers and magazines, as well as through professional television broadcasts."

MH of course is aware of this mountain of counter evidence but remains silent instead of rebutting it because he doesn't want to make his followers aware of these self-damaging facts that would expose his lies and fraud. More details on this blatant deception are revealed at BMUFOR here.

Sacrificing truth for fame and money?


* MH recently published a blog article - Billy Meier UFO Case Censored Again. Why? - claiming that the disruptions during his interview with the host Natalie-Marie Hart and the videos final disappearance must have to do with governmental, corporate, political or religious factions. He claims that this was done to keep his information from reaching the younger generations that most need to have access to it. As it turns out, according to the host herself, it is none other than she who took it out for reasons explained on her fb page.

Here is funny but appropriate response by a member of Bellgab to MH's claim of censorship:

"Wow. Me oh My.

I have heard you say on occasion that you are not a conspiracy theorist. You. Not a conspiracy theorist. The person who claims MUFON and like groups, Michael Moore and prominent journalists, Michio Kaku and Neil Degrasse Tyson, all refuse to discuss Meier for fear of ridicule/loosing their jobs...

You literally think the whole world - and several additional worlds - are out to suppress your message. You. The non-conspiracy theorist.

I don't know, perhaps you are on to something. So, the technical difficulties your young new friend had...which in fact were easily remedied ... for the benefit of her 4,000 strong audience...yeah, who knows, seems like something that nefarious "they" would occupy themselves with (and then ultimately fail at?). Wait, so they just wanted to make this poor girl have another hours worth of work or something?  This was the nature of the scheming of the "them"?  Very curious. Interesting that "they" would act (ineffectually) in this instance, and yet leave you and your galactically important message unmolested during your numerous coast to coast appearances which reach, what, a million plus people...?

The Lord... The aliens... The MIB... Horn's mind works in mysterious ways..."

P.S.:  And by the way, Meier's information seems to have been once again debunked recently. According to Meier, during the new reincarnation process, the newly procreated, growing human embryo is reanimated on the 21st day by the reincarnating spirit form that has returned from the Beyond (aka afterlife/spirit realm) to this temporal life, whereupon the heart of the embryo starts to beat and the development of the basic character begins.. But as it turns out, according to recent research conducted at University of Oxford, the human heart may actually start to beat as early as 16 days.

1 comment:

  1. Michael Horn in his defence and promotion of the Meier case has become a complete psychopath. There's no reasoning with the man.